| Pages: [1] |
1. FIX Statement: Updated Rules of Engagement - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: heyjoe52 Cartiff should really charge people for using that term. Its our trademark BEING IN THE NBSI ALLIANCE. Also i was there when he spouted it off the first times on the XF forums, and in alliance chat. But go for it....
- by Head Cook - at 2005.08.01 02:10:00
|
2. FIX Statement: Updated Rules of Engagement - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Renox Originally by: thoth foc celes arent different.. every choke point has it's gate campers.. thoth, try going past one of our camps in 0.0 with an alt in a neutral corp(preferedly not npc corp) and in an in...
- by Head Cook - at 2005.07.31 23:57:00
|
3. FIX Statement: Updated Rules of Engagement - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Jonkai Edited by: Jonkai on 31/07/2005 17:32:06 Use your main, no balls type person. I would also suggest getting a tech ii dictionary from Yulai... going cheap at the mo since the gate changes. Edit: Tech ii EVE dicti...
- by Head Cook - at 2005.07.31 18:25:00
|
4. FIX Statement: Updated Rules of Engagement - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
LOL@Celets You are naped with IMP, yeah? Do they shoot neutrals in HED and other arezs they dont claim? Explain pls
- by Head Cook - at 2005.07.31 17:27:00
|
5. Open Letter to PA - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Quote: Early this morning i believe the Phoenix alliance made history when it became the first Alliance to use the new system of claiming sovereignty of a system with superior pos numbers. which allowed us to Capture xelas's last remain...
- by Head Cook - at 2005.07.31 02:50:00
|
6.
[5] Announce End of RA presence in [5] Space. - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Its my assertaion that the party doing the poorest and losing most engagments resorts to nitpicking a killboard. Despite the fact that they dont even maintain their own.
- by Head Cook - at 2005.07.30 19:18:00
|
7. Aurora Empire Declaration of Support - in Corporations and Alliances Summit [original thread]
Originally by: DIAL911 Edited by: DIAL911 on 27/07/2005 05:03:52 Oh look honey, a nobody/nothing corp pretending to be important and big, that's so cute! Seeing that your'nobody' allaince is made up of 'nobody' corps, youm should...
- by Head Cook - at 2005.07.30 18:48:00
|
8.
[5] Announce End of RA presence in [5] Space. - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Insane Angel We wouldnt comment about it if [5] pilots kept their mouths shut about it. But [5] pilots claimed that they keep perfect records, and then they back tracked that its mostly correct and then kept backtracking fu...
- by Head Cook - at 2005.07.30 18:41:00
|
9. Section XIII - Glorious Future - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Shin Ra Originally by: Sir JoJo Originally by: Shin Ra W00t, more blues Nebba. At 12,000 yet? Get A clue Try and look in the top Ok, now look at the number of corps you have set to +ve standings. ...
- by Head Cook - at 2005.07.26 01:46:00
|
10. Section XIII - Glorious Future - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: PirateShampoo LOL another 5 flame fest which is aloud to go on for 5 pages. Just dont say nothing bad or it will get locked Lol, tarder
- by Head Cook - at 2005.07.25 22:50:00
|
11. 5 or IMP - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Seeing that CA was the best collection of PVPer's probably as one group in Eve and their dramatic breakup two camps have formed for the most part. Imperium led by Xirtam and [5] Atuk/Shinra. I think its funny how differnet ppl choose their camp. T...
- by Head Cook - at 2005.07.25 09:19:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |